Douglas Triggs (doubt72) wrote,
Douglas Triggs

  • Mood:

Movies That Don't Suck.

For instance, Narnia. Saw it today with someone who won't be mentioned (*cough*, *cough*, Kyaa, *cough*, *cough*). I'd heard almost universally good things about it, and so I was expecting it to be decent. I was surprised, however, that the extent of its lack of suckage included actual coolness. So, Doug gives is an official rating of "that really didn't suck."

I think (once again), that I have to agree with Wil. Despite the financial straights the movie industry seems to be in (or at least that theaters seem to be in), we're really living in a bit of a golden age. A great deal of that has to do with special effect -- right now, if it can be imagined, it can be put on a screen, and put on a screen cheaply enough to make it practical. That not only helps the big special effects movies (Sith, say -- surprisingly, the previous two Star Wars films weren't very impressive in the special effects department, Lucas actually fell behind the curve for a while before catching up again), and movies made into spectacles with special effects (namely, Lord of the Rings), it also helps the more "mainstream" movies in little ways -- namely, "traditional" movies like Master and Commander, or Pirates of the Caribbean.

Mind you, most films are still crap. But the good ones (Serenity) are very good.

Speaking of Pirates, we saw a trailer for the sequel today (really, the only trailer worth mentioning). I'm looking forward to that, because unlike some filmmakers whose names I won't mention (*cough*, *cough*, Wachowski brothers, *cough*, *cough*) the trailer leads me to believe that they actually realized what made the first movie cool, and are giving it to us.

And you know what? I, for one, still like going to the theater, even if it might be a bit overpriced.
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded